Call for expressions of support for a Comprehensive Broadband Strategy

Add a comment

All input from the March 24th South African National Broadband Forum has been received and compiled into a single document which can be accessed here.

The South African National Broadband Forum invites everyone who believes that affordable broadband access is a national priority to express their support for the development and implementation of a comprehensive National Broadband Strategy for South Africa.

A draft framework has been developed with input from multiple stakeholders at a workshop held on March 24 in Johannesburg. We believe that this framework can serve as a basis for building consensus on a
comprehensive national broadband strategy.

Please participate in the public call for expressions of support for a Comprehensive Broadband Strategy. Visit www.broadband4africa.org.za to to read and endorse the full framework which will be presented the to the new government elected on 22 April 2009 and propose that it be used as a basis for building consensus between all stakeholders on a comprehensive national broadband strategy for South Africa.

All South Africans should have affordable broadband access to the Internet!

The South African National Broadband Forum is an initiative of four organisations which share the goal of cheaper and affordable internet access for South Africa: the Association for Progressive CommunicationsSANGONeT, the Shuttleworth Foundation and South Africa Connect. (APC),

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • laaik.it
  • muti
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Smarking
  • TwitThis
  • Furl

National Broadband Strategy Forum - The Movie

Add a comment

For those of you who couldn’t attend the forum on March 24th last month, here’s a video of the event, produced by The African Commons Project. You’ll get a good overview of the day and the issues that were discussed by the participants, as well as an idea of the next steps for broadband strategy in South Africa.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • laaik.it
  • muti
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Smarking
  • TwitThis
  • Furl

Govt, regulation irrelevant in telecoms

Add a comment

by Paul Vecchiatto [ Cape Town | ITWeb, 15 April 2009 ], originally appearing here.

The path to the creation of an information society is through the rollout of mobile broadband, and SA should acknowledge that government and regulatory intervention is all but irrelevant, says Rohan Samarajiva, a visiting Sri Lankan academic.

Speaking at a public lecture at the University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business last night, Samarajiva said research into the developing telecommunications markets of South East Asia holds a number of important lessons for SA.

“The poorest people know how to get the best value for their telecommunications costs. It almost doesn’t matter what plans, regulations and incentives governments and large companies place, the poorest will find the least-cost option.”

Samarajiva served as director-general of the Sri Lankan Department of Communications from 1998 to 1999, and is chairman and CEO of regional ICT policy and research organisation LIRNEasia.net. He is delivering lectures for the Connectivity and Convergence Course: Alternative Regulatory Strategies, being conducted by economic development organisation The Edge Institute.

LIRNEasia.net tracks trends and usage of telecommunications within the Indo-Gangetic Plain, which holds the world’s largest concentration of poorest people. The six countries that are researched are Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Philippines and Thailand.

Samarajiva noted the proliferation of cellular phones has helped improve the lives of literally millions of poor people. This is despite the attempts by governments of those countries to at first restrain the growth of mobile networks and then to try and make money out of them, he explained.

“Licensing grants are often based on corruption rather than on what is needed. It is ironic that corruption has actually freed up the markets and brought the services to the people who need them.”

SA could do well to learn from the lessons of South East Asia, and there are a number of regulatory issues that it could apply, Samarajiva pointed out.

These include allowing for as many players in the market as possible; finding more flexible and creative ways in which to allocate spectrum; having a light market hand, but dealing with competition issues firmly; and generally staying out of the running of the industry.

SA runs the “Alitalia” model of telecommunications as opposed to the “Ryan Air” model that is now prevalent in South East Asia, he noted.

He was referring to an expensive regulatory process that leads to difficult market conditions and prices that stay high and are unlikely to be sustainable in the long-run, as opposed to a no-frills model that allows prices to fall, but quality of service could be spotty.

“You must be very proud of yourselves as a country because your total cost of ownership for a mobile phone is one of the highest in the world at $18 (R190) per month. In Bangladesh, considered one of the worst run countries in the world, this is about $1 per month.”

by Paul Vecchiatto [ Cape Town | ITWeb, 15 April 2009 ], originally appearing here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • laaik.it
  • muti
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Smarking
  • TwitThis
  • Furl

Seminar: The path to the information society: Does it lie through the mobile? Evidence from Asia and thoughts for Africa

Add a comment

On Tuesday 14 April 2008  5.30 for 6.00pm - Dr Rohan Samarajiva  will present the next SA Connect Public Seminar Series:  The path to the information society:  Does it lie through the mobile?  Evidence from Asia and thoughts for Africa.

“A people centered, inclusive, and development-oriented information society where everyone can create, access, utilize and share information and knowledge enabling individuals and communities to achieve their full potential in promoting their sustainable development and improving their quality of life,” was the common objective agreed upon during the World Summit on Information Society (WSIS) process.   This lecture will examine the evidence from representative surveys of teleusers at the Bottom of the Pyramid in six Asian countries, including within them the Indo-Gangetic Plain that is home to the world’s largest concentration of poor people, on whether the path to the information society is likely to be the conventional computer at the end of a broadband connection or a mobile.   The possible contributions of the budget telecom network business model, pioneered in South Asia, will be discussed.  Evidence on awareness and use of the Internet, awareness, trial and use of more-than-voice services on mobiles, and on trust and related factors likely to affect electronic payments will be presented.  Lacunae that must be filled if the bottom of the pyramid is to reach the information society are identified.

Rohan Samarajiva has been active in ICT (including telecom) policy and regulation for over 20 years and is currently  Chair and CEO of LIRNEasia [pronounced Learn Asia – www.lirneasia.net ], a regional ICT policy and regulatory research and capacity building organization, based in Colombo but active across South and Southeast Asia. From 1998-1999, Samarajiva served as Director General of Telecommunications in Sri Lanka at the invitation of the Government of Sri Lanka. Currently he serves as senior advisor on ICTs to Sarvodaya (Sri Lanka’s leading Community Based Organization) and on the ICT Subcommittee of the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce.  He is on the editorial boards of eight academic journals, including the International Journal of Regulation and Governance and Telecommunications Policy and writes a regular column for www.lankabusinessonline.com.  His most recent book was on policy and regulatory roadblocks affecting ICT infrastructure in Asia.  He is Guest Faculty at the TERI University, New Delhi. From 1987 to 2000, he was Assistant and then Associate Professor of Communication and Public Policy and Management at the Ohio State University in Columbus OH, USA.  From 2000-2003, he was Visiting Professor of Economics of Infrastructures at the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands (2000-2003).

The lecture will be held in Lecture Room 5. UCT Graduate School of Business
Breakwater Campus
Portswood Road
Green Point
Cape Town
South Africa

5:30 for 6:00 pm

RSVP - Light refreshments will be served. For catering purposes please RSVP to Marie Ndlovu at mndlovu@the-edge.org.za or on 011 3391757.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • laaik.it
  • muti
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Smarking
  • TwitThis
  • Furl

Pics from the Broadband forum

Add a comment

Pictures from the National Broadband Strategy forum can be found on the African Commons flickr stream.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • laaik.it
  • muti
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Smarking
  • TwitThis
  • Furl

National Broadband Strategy Forum - Final Discussions and Summing Up

Add a comment
A World Café discussion in action

A World Café discussion in action

In the final session of the National Broadband Strategy Forum, facilitator Steve Song invited attendees to comment, add to and generally edit the draft framework which had informed most of the day’s proceedings. “Think of it as policy haiku,” he said, “the best possible scenario for today is that a better version of the framework is written, rather than expanding upon the current content.”
This led to quite a complex and interesting discussion, with various participants raising questions around who exactly the stakeholders referred to in the document are, and whether this document reflected policy or was simply a framework document.

A general consensus was reached on the fact that the draft was not a policy document, but a framework document, and that it needed to be discussed now, so that the opportunity to make representation to government before the elections could be exploited. It was also acknowledged that more richness in the content of the framework could be developed by having broad consensus on the general principles, which could be supplemented by different groups (e.g. the Telecoms Workers Union) at a later point.

Much of the conversation revolved around the actual possibility of making a successful submission, and what that would entail in concrete terms. Detailed road maps and concrete targets were agreed to be the most effective tools, as they’re the most measurable by government, and are useful for holding people accountable when goals are not met. The environmental movement has used conservative targets very successfully in the past, and it was suggested the group look to that model for guidance.

These deliverables could be broken out into short, medium and long-term goals. Some things are easier to do than others, and it would be a good idea to set them now because the new government will be under pressure to deliver something substantial in terms of service delivery. Submissions that bring with them the promise of dramatic change will therefore be appealing to government far more immediately.

The participants in the Sunnyside Park Hotel ballroom.

The participants in the Sunnyside Park Hotel ballroom.

These suggestions were met with general agreement, but actually nailing down these achievable goals proved to be more difficult. The devil, as always, is in the details, and there was much discussion as to when would be a good target for meeting these goals. 2014 was suggested, as it dovetails with some of the markers for the Millennium Development Goals, as well as marking the 20th year of democracy in South Africa.

In terms of targets, it was proposed that South Africa aim to regain it’s status as the ‘number one’ African country in terms of broadband access, and leapfrog over Kenya and Nigeria, both of whom have risen above us. But the nitty-gritty details of what this would mean in terms of measuring the connectivity of homes, municipal wards or towns was debated. Using another country like Kenya as a benchmark was also discussed, as was the possibility of using other countries that are development partners, like India or Brazil.

The Draft Framework

The Draft Framework will be reviewed based on the discussions held at the Forum and will be made available online shortly.

Several participants raised the issue that there is a risk of falling into the “broadband for broadband’s sake” trap, and suggested that the framework document also look at the application of ICTs as a measurable goal, as well as looking at the issue of energy. Energy and broadband will always be an issue, especially now, and if an inclusion was made for this in the document, it might have more traction with government as well as with other stakeholders.

By the end of the session it was generally agreed that there isn’t enough time between now and the election to really revise the targets in the framework document. Rather, it was suggested, use the existing indices and ensure that separate stakeholder groups have the opportunity to work on specific targets (like content policy and job creation) for the future.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • laaik.it
  • muti
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Smarking
  • TwitThis
  • Furl

Hanging Out at the World Café - Broadband Forum Style

Add a comment
Notes from the World Cafe sessions at the Broadband Forum

Notes from the World Café sessions at the Broadband Forum.

Most conferences, forums, working meetings and workshops take a similar format. Everyone arrives full of vim and vigour, and the situation quickly deteriorates into a roomful of people hidden behind their laptops, or twittering in isolation. The real conversations, if there are any, tend to take place in the tea and meal breaks, or over a cigarette quickly sneaked outside.

So it was really refreshing that at the National Broadband Strategy Forum, I was able to be part of really engaging conversations during the sessions, under the very able facilitation of Steve Song. Using the World Café method for fostering collaborative discussion, participants were encouraged to talk openly and easily with each other throughout the day.

“We knew there was going to be a ton of expertise in the room,” says Song, of the decision to use this process of facilitation. “And we wanted to maximise this cognitive resource. Some top regulatory, business and legal people in broadband are here today and if they hadn’t been allowed to speak and speak often, they would have been pissed off.”

The tone of these conversations were kept deliberately inclusive. “The language and metaphor we use around debate are the metaphors of war,” said Song, at the beginning of the Forum. “We say things like ‘I demolished his argument’ and that’s just not constructive.” To counteract this aggression, and the fact that in conference discussion scenarios some participants tend to be less forthcoming, each table appointed a host, whose role was, among other things, to make participants feel welcome at the table. As the groups moved around the tables, the hosts welcomed participants, updated them on conversations, and kept the conversations flowing. One of the challenges around broadband in South Africa is developing a common mindset around the challenges facing the sector. The World Café method, because of it’s inclusive nature, allows people to develop this common mindset, and think about meeting those challenges more effectively.

By covering the tables in large sheets of paper, and leaving colourful markers on the table, the organisers also encouraged participants to draw, write, doodle and colour-in during the sessions, and kept proceedings and conversations informal and flowing.

And flow they did. Several times participants stopped, sat back and said “Wow, this has been a great conversation.” At one of the tables I sat at, even the call for lunch wasn’t enough to break up the discussion. We sat, and continued to discuss the potential for broadband in South Africa to change the way rural children are educated. When you consider that one of the objectives of the Forum was to work collaboratively on refining the Broadband Policy Framework, it is easy to understand how a facilitation method like World Café can be a successful tool.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • laaik.it
  • muti
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Smarking
  • TwitThis
  • Furl

Ory Okolloh: Broadband for e-citizenship

Add a comment
Ory Okolloh discusses how government and civil society need to prepare for broadband.

Ory Okolloh discusses how government and civil society need to prepare for broadband.

Ory Okolloh addressed the audience at the National Broadband Forum to give her perspective on the draft framework based on her experience with e-citizenship, e-government and democratic participation. Ory is a Kenyan blogger and open-government activist who runs Mzalendo, a civic website that tracks the performance of Kenya’s Parliament and its Parliamentarians. She is also the founder member of Ushahidi.

She started off by speaking about how civil society should plays its part in the broadband revolution. Firstly, she pointed out that just as government needs to be held accountable for information made available online, so should civil society organisations. The questions to ask are: How open are we? How accessible is information from my organisation? Secondly, she said that civil society must prepare citizens for broadband by encouraging them to be content creators. In Kenya her organisation is preparing for broadband by running bar camps with local content generators in order to ‘localise the internet’ and make content relevant and usable to the public.

Ory spoke about how lucky we are as South Africans to have Freedom of Information legislation, something which Kenyans have been lobbying their government for eight years now. She encouraged South Africans to use the law in our favour – to demand that information is made available online and to challenge government, using relevant legislation, when these demands are not met.

The next step is making information accessible – and that means making data available in usable formats that can be remixed, mashed-up, mapped and interpreted by citizens, for citizens. Ory also spoke about how in preparing for broadband we should build applications or platforms for both the web and the mobile phone. While the advent of broadband is hot on our heels, at the moment people are most likely to access information through their mobile phones.

That brought her to her final point of how barriers to entry need to be as low as possible to enable citizen participation. She used the example of Mzalendo, which runs on $20 a month for hosting fees mainly, thanks to the strong user-generated aspect of the site. A strong online citizen movement is a powerful way to hold government accountable.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • laaik.it
  • muti
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Smarking
  • TwitThis
  • Furl

Broadband: Enabling a participatory learning environment

Add a comment
Steve Vosloo speaks about how broadband will change the way learners participate in the knowledge economy

Steve Vosloo speaks about how broadband will change the way learners participate in the knowledge economy.

Steve Vosloo, 21st Century Learning Fellow at the Shuttleworth Foundation, painted an inspiring picture of what teaching and learning could be in the future if South African students were broadband-enabled.

Steve started off by reminding us of the hopes that South African leaders have had for South Africa even from 1996 – to be an information society, made up of knowledge workers who participate in the knowledge economy on a global level. What this means is that access to information through ICT is critically needed to allow us to plug in to this knowledge economy, not only as consumers or receivers of information, but as participants too.

Steve spoke about the skills that youth are gaining by being actively engaged with content – they are learning critical reading, skills problem solving, and how to share and collaborate - these kids are learning how to be active 21st century citizens.

In a non-broadband enabled world, education was about acquiring information, trusting the knowledge authorities and asking no questions, it was a one of instruction.

Compare this to an information-rich broadband enabled world (this is the electrifyingly exciting picture of learning that Steve paints!) - where homework becomes user-generated content, that is not written for the teacher to read, but is written for a wider audience, a change of focus which has shown that students improve their writing ability and quality. And when your homework is published on the web, it means that your circle of friends broadens – you learn inter-cultural competence and awareness, and are positioned for peer-to-peer learning. And with a global outlook it means your eyes are opened so that problem solving become global, you have a broader audience and a bigger voice. Essentially this opens learners up to an information rich world that is about constructing meaning from multiple sources, and involves debating, questioning, and interacting.

Steve gave some exciting examples of the type of homework that could be assigned to children in a broadband-enabled learning environment. For example, instead of asking students to read the opening scene of Macbeth at home – how about asking them to find a few video examples on YouTube, and then get them to write a critical comparative analysis of these on their homework blog? The second example he used was one that is actually happening through the popular chat application Mxit – it’s called Dr Math where kids can log in and ask for help with their maths homework from University of Pretoria students.

The point that Steve made through the latter example was how broadband need not give rise to ‘high tech’ education tools, it can enable in different ways, at different speeds, depending on the level and needs of a community. The point is that it enables an array of interactive, participatory, skill-building opportunities for young people.

The other critical point that Steve made was that this approach is completely aligned with outcomes-based education – it teaches learners how to be critical, analytical, communicative, and how to work in a group. He also said that it won’t suddenly turn bad teachers into good teachers – what it will do is empower learners to keep teachers accountable.

Without access to affordable broadband, the ‘participatory gap’ is widening in South Africa - what this means is that South African youth are faced with unequal access to the opportunities, experience, skills and knowledge that will prepare them for full participation in a knowledge economy. This is where broadband steps in as a critical enabler that will truly fulfill the vision of a participatory, information society in South Africa.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • laaik.it
  • muti
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • Smarking
  • TwitThis
  • Furl

Indra de Lanerolle: The Content Conversation

Add a comment
Indra de Lanerolle at the National Broadband Strategy Forum

Indra de Lanerolle at the National Broadband Strategy Forum

The second presentation from today’s National Broadband Strategy Forum painted an exciting picture for the future of content in a fully wired South Africa. Using the small platteland towns of Rosendal and Ficksburg as an analogy, media consultant Indra de Lanerolle pointed out that the founding fathers of Rosendal made the decision to do without a train station, while Ficksburg went the opposite way, and decided to allow the train to run through the town. As a result, Rosendal has remained small, isolated and remote, while Ficksburg has grown into a developed, thriving town. The phenomenon of preferential attachment – that connections will flow to entities that are already well linked, is the same, says de Lanerolle, for broadband users and small towns.

According to de Lanerolle, the arrival of broadband has several consequences for the creation, distribution and use of content, and he painted several possible scenarios for the content industry in South Africa.
The first was that broadband might mean the end of content as we know it. As mass media outlets battle with the Internet for advertising revenue; newspapers, television stations, record labels and the publishing industry have begun to lose out to the online world. He cited the case of ITV in the UK, who, until 2007 had been the largest recipient of advertising in the United Kingdom, although they had to spend 1.3 billion pounds on content per year to make themselves so. In 2007, however, Google UK, who spent nothing on creating content, beat them out of the advertising battle. South Africa hasn’t yet reached that point in the competition cycle, but as Ronnie Apteker, the founder of Internet Solutions, and now a well-known local film producer has pointed out, without mystery there are no [profit] margins.

Content is threatened by broadband because distribution networks and business models are threatened by broadband. In South Africa, media distribution methods have always been controlled by monopolies or oligopolies. There is one plant in South Africa that makes compact discs, and it’s owned by one of the record labels. Newspapers have to fit into the production schedules of the few entities that own printing presses. There are no real “independents” in the music industry because the major record labels control the distribution channels.

Regulation of these channels is also controlled. Telecoms, radio and television are controlled through regulation, and you need a license to broadcast. Traditionally, these monopolies have been able to sustain their control because they reach agreements with the regulator to clamp down on competition in return for meeting various obligations, including content obligations.

Distributors of content have also been able to control the physical and intellectual property of the content – physically through the technology (the sheer size of boxes of film made it easy, in the old days to control movies) and through law by the use of rights.

These rights were, in the past, governed by arcane systems, which divided the world of consumers into complex territories and markets. Ironically, it was these arcane systems that lead to piracy in the case of the local film Tsotsi – the systems of markets, rights and zones meant that many people pirated the film because it was unavailable to them through legitimate markets.

In a broadband world, however, every user has access to the means of distribution and broadband connects every point of production and consumption to every other point. The digital nature of the space also means that there is no physical property that can be locked down by distributors. DRM was an attempt to do this, but has proven to be, on the whole, unsuccessful, and is falling away as a method of control. DVDs had controls for different markets and zones, but the easy availability of crack codes has made this unfeasible. Broadband undermines all of these traditional business models.

So the question, says de Lanerolle is this: Should we care about the disintegration of old models? The answer, he says, is ‘yes’ only if we have a very narrow view of our (national) interests. He quoted Bill Clinton’s famous campaign phrase: “It’s the [whole] economy, stupid!” – the potential for development with broadband is so great that these opportunities should be embraced.

He cited a pilot project in the British region of Cornwall as an example of the potential of growth through broadband connectivity. Cornwall is a remote area, relatively inaccessible by car, and without any major cities. But it super-wired, as a result of a pilot project by the British government to connect the entire region through super-fast broadband connectivity.

As a result, labour productivity in Cornwall went up by up 5-10%, and the increased business process efficiency that resulted grew Cornwall’s GDP by up to 10%. What this example also showed, he said, s that the digital divide isn’t just a question of comparing the developed and developing world. It’s also about the degrees of ‘wiredness’.

Simple reductions of rates that make access cheaper are not, de Lanerolle said, a solution to the need for development. Reducing rates for telecoms, like Telkom had done for call centre development, will never be enough. If Skype or Google Voice allows calls to be made for what is, essentially, free, it makes no sense for telecoms’ offerings to be anything less than the benchmark of connectivity.

Deregulation, he says, is not the answer though. Content in South Africa is still regulated by the framework used before 1994, which is getting increasingly out of sync with the telecoms regulation as competition increases. As an example, digital migration of television is not introducing any more comepetition in South Africa. One possible cause of this is that there is no integrated approach from civil society or government to the issue of broadband content development or regulation.

Another challenge to content in the context of broadband is that of consumption. 93% of South Africans are reached by radio, 83% of South Africans can access television, and only 7% use the internet. How to make broadband as available as radio and television is a huge challenge.

Broadband, says de Lanerolle, should be defined broadly. It’s a moving target, and people’s levels of connectivity shift as their access to applications moves. It’s not possible for many people to access Web 2.0 applications and develop content because their connections and technology are not sophisticated enough.

The final scenario de Lanerolle painted is one where the flow of content shifts and becomes more of a conversation. With the potential collapse of traditional distribution methods, which operate in a one-to-many model, the potential exists for more horizontal, conversational models, and it’s this potential, according to de Lanerolle, that makes the possibilities for audiences much more exciting.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • laaik.it
  • muti
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot